<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Atheism, Old Lie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.danielabbey.com/2009/12/new-atheism-old-lie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.danielabbey.com/2009/12/new-atheism-old-lie/</link>
	<description>words + faith + pictures = life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 04:00:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.danielabbey.com/2009/12/new-atheism-old-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 18:43:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielabbey.com/?p=176#comment-102</guid>
		<description>i hear ya. yup, science and God are not at odds. in fact, science POINTS TO God, wouldn&#039;t you agree? dawkins and his cohorts tend to treat God and science as an irreconcilable dichotomy. it&#039;s sad really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hear ya. yup, science and God are not at odds. in fact, science POINTS TO God, wouldn&#8217;t you agree? dawkins and his cohorts tend to treat God and science as an irreconcilable dichotomy. it&#8217;s sad really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ding</title>
		<link>http://www.danielabbey.com/2009/12/new-atheism-old-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>ding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 14:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielabbey.com/?p=176#comment-101</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan,

That&#039;s not what i meant. Science and the Bible both makes sense for me. When science hits the dead end thats where the Bible starts. For me they are incomparable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s not what i meant. Science and the Bible both makes sense for me. When science hits the dead end thats where the Bible starts. For me they are incomparable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan</title>
		<link>http://www.danielabbey.com/2009/12/new-atheism-old-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-100</link>
		<dc:creator>dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 05:25:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielabbey.com/?p=176#comment-100</guid>
		<description>hi ding! may i just ask: what do you mean both sides make sense to you? that God is both real and not real? i&#039;m sure that&#039;s not what you mean although i&#039;m a little confused hehe. anyway, thanks for dropping by and reading this man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi ding! may i just ask: what do you mean both sides make sense to you? that God is both real and not real? i&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s not what you mean although i&#8217;m a little confused hehe. anyway, thanks for dropping by and reading this man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ding</title>
		<link>http://www.danielabbey.com/2009/12/new-atheism-old-lie/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>ding</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.danielabbey.com/?p=176#comment-99</guid>
		<description>hmmmmm both sides for me makes sense hehehe</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmmmm both sides for me makes sense hehehe</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
